| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy checks |
| From: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:24:05 +0100 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040318221904.45011167.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040308110331.GA20719@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <404C874D.4000907@xxxxxxxxx> <20040308115858.75cdddca.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <4059CF27.4030803@xxxxxxxxx> <20040318221904.45011167.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1 |
David S. Miller wrote: Other than the minor comments I've made the most unhappy I am with the input patch, and you agree it's grotty too. Let's look for a better solution, perhaps with new top-level SKB state, and then we can put all of your work in after you're made the other minor fixes I've asked for as well. I'm going to make the changes you suggested. Can you please explain what you imagine with the new top-level skb state ? Regards Patrick |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC, PATCH 3/5]: netfilter+ipsec - input hooks, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC, PATCH 3/5]: netfilter+ipsec - input hooks, Patrick McHardy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy checks, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Xeon smp performance, satya srikanth |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |