| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: network delay simulation |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:25:15 -0800 |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040317100001.7d33accc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040316151058.3cc2fa28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040316174134.2f1da12a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1079539766.1034.99.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040317095107.60728e4e.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040317100001.7d33accc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:00:01 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > In an earlier project we had a test suite that failed the Nth allocation, > then repeated startup failing from 1 till all allocations in a typical > interaction round trip had been tested. Sure led to some nasty failures > in the test bed, which was way better than the customer finding it. Yes, but we don't really want alloc_skb() doing this, this makes the failures go to other places (like TCP, netlink, whatever) instead of what you're trying to actually test (RX out of buffer handling in a specific driver). It is an interesting thing to test too, no doubt. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: network delay simulation, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | OOPS when force unloading sctp with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB enabled, Sridhar Samudrala |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: network delay simulation, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] packet delay scheduler, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |