| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: network delay simulation |
| From: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:00:01 -0800 |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040317095107.60728e4e.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Open Source Development Lab |
| References: | <20040316151058.3cc2fa28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040316174134.2f1da12a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1079539766.1034.99.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040317095107.60728e4e.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:51:07 -0800 "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 17 Mar 2004 11:09:26 -0500 > jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > A simple algorithm is random(). > > Yes, but you want to weight it just a bit. Userland could use random() > to generate the bit-stream in fact :) In an earlier project we had a test suite that failed the Nth allocation, then repeated startup failing from 1 till all allocations in a typical interaction round trip had been tested. Sure led to some nasty failures in the test bed, which was way better than the customer finding it. -- Stephen Hemminger mailto:shemminger@xxxxxxxx Open Source Development Lab http://developer.osdl.org/shemminger |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: network delay simulation, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: network delay simulation, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: network delay simulation, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: network delay simulation, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |