| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: network delay simulation |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:51:07 -0800 |
| Cc: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1079539766.1034.99.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040316151058.3cc2fa28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040316174134.2f1da12a.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1079539766.1034.99.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 17 Mar 2004 11:09:26 -0500 jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A simple algorithm is random(). Yes, but you want to weight it just a bit. Userland could use random() to generate the bit-stream in fact :) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] 2.6.x Re: Tulip 21040 hangs with ifconfig promisc, Krzysztof Halasa |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: network delay simulation, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: network delay simulation, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: network delay simulation, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |