| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: network delay simulation |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:00:48 +0100 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040316151058.3cc2fa28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040316151058.3cc2fa28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:10:58 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Still bumming around for how to easily simulate long latencies. > There is NISTnet but that is fugly old 2.2 code; and Dummynet, and hitbox > which are FreeBSD based. The existing traffic shaper might do, but it seems > to be limited to lower speed lines and needs some work (using atomic_set > do own locking for instance). > > Probably "the cowboy way" would be to right a new net/scheduler to just > do FIFO delay. > > Any ideas/comments? Somebody have some code sitting in a drawer? iirc there was a 2.4 port of NistNet. Porting it to 2.6 is probably not that much work. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | network delay simulation, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: network delay simulation, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | network delay simulation, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: network delay simulation, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |