On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:07:24 -0800 "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
| On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:17:17 -0800 Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
| | Randy.Dunlap wrote:
| |
| | > This is just a first pass/RFC. It moves "Networking support" out of
| | > the "Device Drivers" menu, which seems helpful to me. However,
| | > ISTM that it should really just be the "Networking options" here
| | > and not include Amateur Radio, IrDA, and Bluetooth support.
| | > I.e., I think that those latter 3 should fall under Device Drivers.
| | > Does that make sense to anyone else?
| |
| | Just a comment that those 3 subsystems are not just
| | device drivers, they have non-trivial amount of code
| | in the protocol stack under ../net/. So would moving
| | them to device drivers be misleading in any way?
| |
| | I can see pulling out Networking support from under
| | device drivers, though.
|
| Agreed, I looked again and those 3 should stay under
| "Networking support." I'm still looking for other items
| to move to make it all easier to navigate.
Does it make sense to anyone besides me to move protocol-related
modules like SLIP, PPP, and PLIP from Device Drivers/Network device(s)
to "Networking support"?
They feel more like protocols than device drivers to me....
| | > Does this need to be discussed on netdev (also)?
| |
| | Yes. :)
|
| OK. Thanks for cc-ing it.
|
| | thanks,
| | Nivedita
--
~Randy
|