| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP) |
| From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:56:26 +0200 (EET) |
| Cc: | niv@xxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, ruddk@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, chester.f.johnson@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040304013618.31a827ba.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20031212003143.062598e9.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312130205460.7978-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040304013618.31a827ba.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello,
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, David S. Miller wrote:
> Julian, I'd like to bring this back to life. Can you post a new version
> of the ip_rt_ignore_tos patch against current 2.6.x?
Done. Essentially, this patch combines the last posted
two diff files:
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/tmp/tos-6.diff
> We'll discuss and integrate just like for the ARP stuff.
>
> Sorry for sitting on this for so long, been busy...
np, the remaining questions are:
- do we need to walk all tos values for ip_rt_redirect in the same
way as for ip_rt_frag_needed, if yes, how to name this flag?
icmp_redirect_tos_mode? match_tos_on_redirect? May be
pmtu_mode can be renamed to match_tos_on_pmtu?
- from another thread: whether ICMP redirects modify only
routes via gateway when shared_media is ON:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=107109827516060&w=2
At the final I'll change some doc files to explain the new flags.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] proportional share accept(), Vivek Kashyap |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [janitor] "Lots of unnecessary casts in drivers can be removed", Randy.Dunlap |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP), kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |