Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack

netdev

Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack

To:	chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:10:36 -0800
Cc:	chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200402252354.i1PNs8g5006332@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<200402252354.i1PNs8g5006332@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:54:09 -0500
"chas williams (contractor)" <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> backport of similar patch for 2.6.  
> 
> please apply to 2.4 -- thanks
 ...
> # [ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack

This conflicts with a previous patch you sent me in this group entitled:

[ATM]: [lec] send queued packets immediately after path switch

So it fully rejected when I tried to apply this one, it looks to me
like the changes this is trying to add are already in there as a result
of the previous change.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, chas williams (contractor) Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, David S. Miller <= Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, chas williams (contractor) [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, chas williams (contractor) Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, David S. Miller

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] send queued packets immediately after path switch, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, chas williams (contractor)
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, chas williams (contractor)
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lec] put back pressure on network stack, chas williams (contractor)
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]