| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:26:01 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040222234750.GA78924@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040222234750.GA78924@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 23 Feb 2004 00:47:50 +0100 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> wrote: > I noticed that a 64bit kernel only downloads half as fast over a PPPoE DSL > connection than a 32bit kernel on the same hardware. The reason seems > to be that PPPoE uses the default 64K snd/rcv buffers at socket creation. > The bigger sk_buff header size on the 64bit kernel pushed > the buffer into being too small and preventing good throughput. I have no problem with this, but hey while we're at it why not do the same for the core defaults instead? I see no real harm in this at all as it's not a pppoe specific issue. What say you Andi? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Tuning e1000 driver to avoid interface lock down, Kiran Kiran |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Increase snd/rcv buffers in pppoe, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |