Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX

netdev

Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX

To:	Olaf Kirch <okir@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:17:05 -0800
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20040217121726.GD8554@xxxxxxx>
References:	<20040217121726.GD8554@xxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:17:26 +0100
Olaf Kirch <okir@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm currently investigating a problem in udp recvmsg. In short, a test
> program selects on the socket, gets woken up as a packet arrives, but
> recvmsg return EAGAIN because the UDP checksum was wrong.

Thanks Olaf, I'm not ignoring your patch I just didn't get to it today.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, Olaf Kirch Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, Andi Kleen Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, David S. Miller <= Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, Andi Kleen Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, Olaf Kirch Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, Olaf Kirch

Previous by Date:	Re: 2.6: QoS scheduling not working with IP-over-IP, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: Restrict local IP announcements in ARP requests, Julian Anastasov
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, Andi Kleen
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, Andi Kleen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]