On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:30:05 +0100 Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I guess he meant something like this, but I still think it encourages > broken configurations in combination with non-work-conserving > schedulers. Patrick, "(x || 1)" is not the same as "(x ? x : 1)" :-) Please make a new patch. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Restrict local IP announcements in ARP requests, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6: QoS scheduling not working with IP-over-IP, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6: QoS scheduling not working with IP-over-IP, Patrick McHardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |