netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX

from [Andi Kleen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Olaf Kirch <okir@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:30:42 +0100
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040217121726.GD8554@xxxxxxx>
References: <20040217121726.GD8554@xxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:17:26 +0100
Olaf Kirch <okir@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Any comments welcome.

Looks good to me.

One small optimization would be to quickly check the receive queue without 
taking the
receive queue lock. This would avoid the additional lock in many cases.

-Andi
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, Olaf Kirch
Next by Date:  ip multicast bug, Karlis Peisenieks
Previous by Thread:  [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, Olaf Kirch
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] 2.6 UDP recvmsg vs POSIX, David S. Miller
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]