| To: | satya srikanth <satyasrikanth2001@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: gigabit ethernet |
| From: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:32:09 -0800 |
| Cc: | Cheng Jin <chengjin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Xiaoliang (David) Wei" <weixl@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20040214140914.3341.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Candela Technologies |
| References: | <20040214140914.3341.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 |
satya srikanth wrote: My CPU is unable to handle anything more than this. Is it possible to handle 1000Mbps for any packet size or atleast something better than this by using more powerful machines. If anyone of you have experimented with this, can you give an idea of what kind of amachine do I need for this. Try a machine with a 64/66 PCI bus, or preferably, a PCI-X bus that can run 64/100 or better. I got line speed packet generation and reception on a dual 2.8Ghz Xeon machine with PCI-X (64/100) bus and a dual port Intel pro/1000 NIC. I tested with 1500 byte packets and transmitted and received 999Mbps of traffic between two ports (total of ~4Gbps across the PCI backplane). I wasn't routing or anything like that, but at least for packet generation it worked fine. Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Fix checksum bug for multicast/broadcast packets on postrouting hook, Mika Penttilä |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6 SCTP updates, Sridhar Samudrala |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: gigabit ethernet, satya srikanth |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sysctl variable to force IGMP version [PATCH], Takashi Hibi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |