netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] IPV6: kill in6_u.u6_addrX

To: dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPV6: kill in6_u.u6_addrX
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:20:41 +0900 (JST)
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <OFE6A4DD6C.ACB3D0B4-ON88256E38.001F6E3F-88256E38.0020FDCB@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20040212.140022.128605177.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <OFE6A4DD6C.ACB3D0B4-ON88256E38.001F6E3F-88256E38.0020FDCB@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article 
<OFE6A4DD6C.ACB3D0B4-ON88256E38.001F6E3F-88256E38.0020FDCB@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 
11 Feb 2004 22:03:04 -0800), David Stevens <dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> Not related to what you're trying to fix, and I haven't
> checked if more recent standards have defined them, but
> if not, me might want to look at changing these to
> 
> #define _s6_addr32      _S6_un._s6_u32

Please don't.

Userspace uses sockaddr_in6 defined in glibc, not one in kernel.
It is glibc issue.

Well, it is one of my TODO to revisit IPv6 related headers.
They're not friendly with glibc headers...

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>