| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours |
| From: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 09 Feb 2004 13:39:51 -0800 |
| Cc: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040209121926.6f016ebf.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Candela Technologies |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402082234110.6268@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040209121926.6f016ebf.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 |
David S. Miller wrote: On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 22:44:05 +0200 (EET) Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> wrote:- the 'skb->pkt_type == PACKET_HOST' check has no semantic anymore, the requestor should have same information no matter the packet type. In all cases we add response delay for all requests, broadcast or unicast, to help other authoritative hosts to reply before us.Do we really want to reply to all the garbage tcpdump causes us to capture? That is what the pkt_type is dealing with. If we're in promiscuous mode, we'll hear ARP requests meant not for any of our devices, we should not proxy for them right? Arp requests are always broadcasts, so promisc changes nothing, right? -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, James Morris |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, James Morris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |