| To: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 8 Feb 2004 13:14:17 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402082234110.6268@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402082234110.6268@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 22:44:05 +0200 (EET) Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> wrote: > Comments? This is a dicey situation in that when the entry does become valid this does not trigger a proxy arp by us, does it? I guess the original requestor will redo the request, so I'm just mentioning this in passing. This is an area where admittedly I'm not well versed. So proxy ARP experts speak up :) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fragmentation Attack, Gandalf The White |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fragmentation Attack, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, Julian Anastasov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, Julian Anastasov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |