Re: Fw: [Kernel-janitors] net/atm/clip.c: check kmem_cache_create() #1

[Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :
[...]
> how about the following instead?  we probably shouldnt register the

As long as the ugly-ifdef patrol does not bite, it's fine with me. :o)

> proc entry until clip_tbl is going to be ready for use anyway (the
> arp table iterators should probably also use clip_tbl instead of
> clip_tbl_hook).

It would not hurt. Do you have a specific race in mind before I send
an update on top your patch for the clip_tbl_hook -> clip_tbl change ?

--
Ueimor