netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] IPV6: note on shared socket options

from [David Stevens] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPV6: note on shared socket options
From: David Stevens <dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:02:15 -0700
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20040205.110955.10680487.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sensitivity:

I see what you mean now; I agree. I'm not sure all of the other
socket options for each of v4 and v6 appear in a single file,
either; they definitely aren't all grouped so you can tell they come
from the same numeric namespace. So, picking new numbers
requires some detective work, but every little bit helps. :-)

+-DLS

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [question] netif_rx() - why don't call raise_softirq()?, Lee, Kuk Hyun
Next by Date:  Re: FW: Submission for S2io 10GbE driver, Anton Blanchard
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] IPV6: note on shared socket options, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] IPV6: note on shared socket options, Pekka Savola
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]