netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: (usagi-core 17336) Re: [PATCH|RFC] IPv6: have a proxy discard link-l

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: (usagi-core 17336) Re: [PATCH|RFC] IPv6: have a proxy discard link-local traffic
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:24:19 +0900 (JST)
Cc: vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040203.171952.105535895.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401272259160.28384@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040128115910.0a83e906.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040203.171952.105535895.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <20040203.171952.105535895.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 03 Feb 
2004 17:19:52 +0900 (JST)), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
says:

> In article <20040128115910.0a83e906.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 28 Jan 2004 
> 11:59:10 -0800), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> 
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:11:20 +0200 (EET)
> > Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Dave, since even Pekka is now convinced this patch doesn't break anything,
> > > would you consider applying it? :)
> > 
> > Yoshfuji asked for some time, so let us give it to him so he
> > may analyze your change without rushing.
> 
> David, I'm (or we're) ok with this patch. Please apply. Thanks.
> (But I still do not eat the proxy ND patch.)

Oops, I need to say something.
I however think this should be postponed after linux-2.6.2 is up
since this patch is not so "critical" fix.

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>