[Top] [All Lists]

Why is ifenslave.c in the kernel tree?

To: shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Why is ifenslave.c in the kernel tree?
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:02:58 +0100
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Just looking over the 2.6.3 diffs I see that ifenslave is actively
maintained in Documenation/ of the kernel tree.  Isn't that a _really_
odd place for a userland tool?  We have a policy of not having any
userland tools not used for building in the kernel tree, and especially
none of the distributors will pick it up from there.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>