[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates
From: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:01:20 -0800 (PST)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402061649001.10831@localhost.localdomain> <>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, David S. Miller wrote:

> On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:07:48 -0800 (PST)
> Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I guess i was influenced by the TCP specific tcp_rmem/tcp_wmem. But TCP
> > seems to be using them as a vector of 3 values and tuning the buffer sizes
> > dynamically based on these values.
> > As of now, SCTP doesn't do any tuning dynamically so i could have used the
> > core rmem_default/wmem_default.
> >
> > Do you want me to remove the specialized SCTP sysctl's?
> It seems as duplication if there is no specific need to have seperate
> controls right?

OK. I removed the SCTP specific rmem/wmem. Please do a pull again from
to get the following cset.

ChangeSet@xxxxxx, 2004-02-09 11:14:24-08:00, sri@xxxxxxxxxx
  [SCTP] Removed SCTP specific rmem/wmem sysctl's and use the global
         rmem_default/wmem_default values for SCTP socket buffer sizes.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>