| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] IPV6: use ipv6_addr_any() |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Jan 2004 20:29:55 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401281256260.21205-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20040128.163043.120256112.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401281256260.21205-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401281256260.21205-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:57:27 +0200 (EET)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote: > > Use simple ipv6_addr_any() > > where ipv6_addr_type() is called only to check for unspecified address. > > Speakign of which, should it be better to change this to _unspecified > if we're changing this as one could be led to believe that "any" > refers to "any IPv6 address" which is obviously not the case. I don't think we need to change the name for now. It however should be done by another patch if it is better to be changed. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Deadlock problem with dev->refcnt somewhere in netlink/multicast..., Willy Tarreau |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [BK] Updated 2.6 typhoon driver for 3CR990 & 3CR990B cards, David Dillow |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] IPV6: use ipv6_addr_any(), Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] IPV6: use ipv6_addr_any(), David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |