| To: | xma@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH]snmp6 64-bit counter support in proc.c |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:43:19 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | kumarkr@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <OFB1A49B9E.7066A43F-ON87256E24.0005F5B5@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <OFB1A49B9E.7066A43F-ON87256E24.0005F5B5@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:08:04 -0800 Do you really care about this situation? It only happens as a race within one instruction in 4 billion. It will slow everytime if we do this way. correctness > performance If MRTG hits this case and my net usage graphs have weird spikes in them as a result, can I assign the bugzilla entry to you? :-) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH]snmp6 64-bit counter support in proc.c, Shirley Ma |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | multicast loop with include filters fix [PATCH], David Stevens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH]snmp6 64-bit counter support in proc.c, Shirley Ma |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH]snmp6 64-bit counter support in proc.c, Krishna Kumar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |