[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless

To: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless
From: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:19:12 -0800
Address: HP Labs, 1U-17, 1501 Page Mill road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
E-mail: jt@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040119210132.0c52df58.ak@xxxxxxx>
Organisation: HP Labs Palo Alto
References: <20040119123343.GA16292@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040119123945.A32623@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040119141041.2cccbc3d.ak@xxxxxxx> <20040119055615.4380e157.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040119153919.14102937.ak@xxxxxxx> <20040119063921.586b37ac.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040119155412.2bffee5a.ak@xxxxxxx> <20040119194943.GA9360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040119210132.0c52df58.ak@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jt@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:01:32PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> [1] I actually have a Samsung wireless card, but it's not working
> due to missing support for the Cirrus 6729 PCMCIA bridge on there.

        I was wondering, because Samsungs cards should be supported by
the HostAP driver (which remind me, HostAP needs to go in the kernel).

> >     One of the main strength of OpenSource is that you can
> > recompile for your platform, and I think we should fully exploit this
> > advantage, especially for the base system. Otherwise, why not enable
> > 16bit compatibility on i386 for ELKS packages ?
> I maintain the 32bit emulation on x86-64 and booting an unmodified 32bit 
> distribution
> is an important test case for me. Your suggestion is like someone suggesting 
> to you to just use ethernet with cables instead of this unreliable wireless 
> stuff...

        This analogy doesn't work. If your network is wireless, you
won't connect to it with an Ethernet card (and vice versa). A fully 64
bits userspace has only very minor downside, and most users won't see
any difference. If we follow your line of thought, we should all be
using a 16bit userspace on i386 (more compact, more compatible).

> >     It seems that the BK->Web stuff has not yet picked your
> > updates, because I don't see them (and of course the snapshot on
> > is too old).
> It's actually there, just hidden in a large batch of network updates.

        It was backlogged, it seems to be catching up (but I need to
see if I find it).

> -Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>