| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6: added sysctl for maximum number of addresses |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:34:33 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401151721380.16629-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20040115.213014.133549139.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401151721380.16629-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401151721380.16629-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:23:23 +0200 (EET)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote: > > In some configuration, we need addresses more than 16 addresses per > > interface. > > This pach adds new sysctl for configuring the maximum number of addresses > > per interface. > > Doesn't 16 addresses per interface sound like an awfully small number? > Consider a web service which wants to have a different IP address per > virtual host. These are not really uncommon. My point is the value becomes configurable. "16" is consistent with current behavior. I do not change the default value with this patch. If you think it is too small, feel free to submit a patch to increase the default value. Thanks. --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH|RFC] IPv6 netfilter: a module for complete proxy ND support, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] support for large number of network devices., Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6: added sysctl for maximum number of addresses, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6: added sysctl for maximum number of addresses, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |