| To: | vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH|RFC] IPv6 netfilter: a module for complete proxy ND support |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:34:30 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401141726490.24125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401141250470.24125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040114.210427.104284595.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401141726490.24125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401141726490.24125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:00:24 +0200 (EET)), Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ wrote: > > > I don't think so. Proxy should not depend on netfilter. : > There aren't that many ways of doing this "hack" cleanly. Well... We (or only me?) might have mis-understood the "proxy" in Linux :-P It is not for proxy in rfc2461, is it? It is for proxy in Thaler's draft, isn't it? If so... hmm... let me consider... --yoshfuji |
| Previous by Date: | Source Specific Query of MLDv2, Takashi Hibi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH|RFC] IPv6 netfilter: a module for complete proxy ND support, Ville Nuorvala |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH|RFC] IPv6 netfilter: a module for complete proxy ND support, Ville Nuorvala |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH|RFC] IPv6 netfilter: a module for complete proxy ND support, Ville Nuorvala |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |