| To: | mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:10:57 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, xma@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040115005252.6e6f1d81.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20031205145700.120e9e68.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200401141552.51424.mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040115005252.6e6f1d81.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20040115005252.6e6f1d81.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:52:52 -0800), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > > Once receiving a router advertisement message, > > a netlink notification event will be created. > > > > This patch is against linux-2.6.1. > > This patch looks fine, except I can't see how RTM_GETRA is used anywhere. > Even if it will be used by some future change, please remove it until that > later change is made. Hmm, why do we need this? What kind of usage? I think you can do this in user space by opening raw socket. --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6Prefix netlink notification, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH|RFC] IPv6: have a proxy discard link-local traffic, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification, Shirley Ma |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |