netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification
From: Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:38:49 -0800
Cc: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sensitivity:

Thank Yoshfuji to point out.

But the patch is still needed for the Router, so it should be put in ndisc_router_discovery() when it's determined as a router. Are you OK with that?

Thanks
Shirley Ma
IBM Linux Technology Center
15300 SW Koll Parkway
Beaverton, OR 97006-6063
Phone: (503) 578-7638
FAX: (503) 578-3228


To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Shirley Ma/Beaverton/IBM@IBMUS, mashirle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6RouterAdvert netlink notification


On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:37:10 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@ <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In article <OFB4F51C5A.FC479F2C-ON87256E1C.007B64B8@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:31:47 -0800), Shirley Ma <xma@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
>
> > This patch is going to be used by SNMP for ipv6RouterAdvert Table. I will
> > remove this Micro, and resubmit the patch.
>
> This patch is conceptually wrong.

Ok, since this is controversial I'll back it out of my tree.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>