[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6 MIB:ipv6DefaultRouterTable
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:53:41 +0900 (JST)
Cc: xma@xxxxxxxxxx, mashirle@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <> <>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <20040115113840.4b7eb5d8.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 15 Jan 2004 
11:38:40 -0800), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> We can create new files to present information in new ways and formats,
> but I totally prefer using netlink based information gathering over making
> new procfs files.

Although this discussion is about rtnetlink message,
problem will be solved if we provide jiffies for neigbours 

--yoshfuji @ let me sleep...

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>