| To: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPSEC and MPLS priority for 2.6? |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:49:52 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312180930560.12194-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312180930560.12194-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:36:15 +0200 (EET) Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andrew characterized (or Dave) did the lack of MPLS support as a huge > issue for serious IPSEC usage in: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/must-fix/should-fix-7.txt > [see below] > > .. I don't agree. You're probably right, it's priority can be decreased. If the MPLS stuff is ready later in the 2.6.x series though, it will be very easy to merge safely. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | IPSEC and MPLS priority for 2.6?, Pekka Savola |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPSEC and MPLS priority for 2.6?, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | IPSEC and MPLS priority for 2.6?, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPSEC and MPLS priority for 2.6?, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |