netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP)

To: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PMTU issues due to TOS field manipulation (for DSCP)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:55:27 +0100
Cc: ruddk@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, chester.f.johnson@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3FD7826F.1050308@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312101020480.21684-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031210203433.3747b7fd.ak@xxxxxxx> <3FD7826F.1050308@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:30:39 -0800
Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 
> > I don't think the network users will be very happy if you require changing 
> > all
> > end hosts this way. How about the following hack? For DF=1 packets
> > the ipid field is useless. When you rewrite the TOS to DSCP save
> > the old TOS in the ipid field.  When you see an ICMP fragment required
> > message with the right DSCP on the router restore the old TOS from the ipid 
> > field.
> 
> Wouldnt this require changes at the both ends, router and
> host? How would we sync?

Only the router would need to change (and rewrite ICMP messages, which is a 
bit nasty, but then compatibility is not always fun) 

-Andi

P.S.: I am not opposed to fixing linux for this, just I have my doubts
that fixing all end hosts is a practical solution for the problem.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>