| To: | "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, "Rask Ingemann Lambertsen" <rask@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [RFR] new e100 driver |
| From: | "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:01:37 -0800 |
| Cc: | <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcO7XoL3HvkggIM8TJamxnwXBN/tjgAHRT6Q |
| Thread-topic: | [RFR] new e100 driver |
> > I would be nice if the documentation said so. A few days > > ago I spent half an hour or so trying to figure out why frames > > sent by an 82558 were padded with 0x00 rather than the > > documented 0x7e (with no sign of skb_padto(), memset() or > > anything similiar in the driver). > > Do you mean the PDF documentation? I dunno how much control Scott > Feldman and his team have over that. Sorry Rask. It'll be easier to accumulate several doc changes and roll them out at one time. Do you have other doc updates? I'll try to maintain a list for when we do an update. -scott |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH]snmp6 64-bit counter support in proc.c, Shirley Ma |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [2/4] pollcontroller patch for 2.6.0-test10-bk25-netdrvr-exp1, Feldman, Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFR] new e100 driver, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | [BK PATCHES] 2.6.x experimental net driver queue, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |