| To: | Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] 2.4 lacks dummy SET_NETDEV_DEV |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Dec 2003 03:28:25 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031202104024.GA9163@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20031110181917.GA25846@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031110221430.GA26556@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031110221429.04732a57.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031202104024.GA9163@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:40:25 +0200
Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:14:29PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > I agree, someone should merge in the dummy SET_NETDEV_DEV once
> > Marcelo starts up 2.4.24-preX
>
> Ping :-)
Yes Marcelo, please apply this.
> --- linux-2.4.22-1.2115.nptl/include/linux/netdevice.h.orig 2003-11-10
> 20:08:42.922635848 +0200
> +++ linux-2.4.22-1.2115.nptl/include/linux/netdevice.h 2003-11-10
> 20:09:09.754556776 +0200
> @@ -456,6 +456,8 @@
> #endif /* CONFIG_NET_DIVERT */
> };
>
> +/* 2.6 compatibility */
> +#define SET_NETDEV_DEV(net, pdev) do { } while (0)
>
> struct packet_type
> {
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.0-test11: dst_cache_overflow causing unresponsive box, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPv6 MIB:ipv6PrefixTable implementation, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] 2.4 lacks dummy SET_NETDEV_DEV, Pekka Pietikainen |
| Next by Thread: | [RTNETLINK] Provide real oif, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |