netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0-test11-bk27-netdrvr-exp1 - r8169 update

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0-test11-bk27-netdrvr-exp1 - r8169 update
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 01:47:38 +0100
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, brad_mssw@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031127235143.A16767@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:51:43PM +0100
References: <20031122183001.GA16993@xxxxxxx> <20031124000939.A456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031126004550.A25408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031127235143.A16767@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Hopefully last round of Brad/Realtek's merging. 

Patches apply in this order:
1 - r8169-hw_start.patch
2 - r8169-missing-tx-stats.patch
3 - r8169-intr_mask.patch

on top of:

  2.6.0-test11
+ 2.6.0-test9-bk25-netdrvr-exp1
+ r8169-mac-phy-version
+ r8169-init_one
+ r8169-timer

The unconditional calls to rtl8169_{rx/tx}_interrupt in rtl8169_interrupt()
are not integrated. That should not make a huge difference.

--
Ueimor

Attachment: r8169-hw_start.patch
Description: Text document

Attachment: r8169-missing-tx-stats.patch
Description: Text document

Attachment: r8169-intr_mask.patch
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>