[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip

To: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 02:14:39 +0100
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, xose@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1069941123.1027.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3FC3FB99.70700@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031127010324.061cac3b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031127122021.3ac80a86.ak@xxxxxxx> <20031127122642.046d07ce.ak@xxxxxxx> <1069941123.1027.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 27 Nov 2003 08:52:03 -0500
jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Andi, is this the driver you were playing those neat tricks with
> getting rid of some of the nastiness in eth_type_trans()?


I didn't attempt to NAPIize it though. Also it is still somewhat buggy.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>