Re: [PATCH 2.6]: IPv6: strcpy -> strlcpy

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <20031127194602.A25015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 27 Nov 2003 
19:46:02 +0000), Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> > > > I agree, using sizeof() is the less error prone way of
> > > > doing things like this.
> > > > 
> > > > Felipe could you please rewrite your patch like this?
> > > 
> > > Done!
> > 
> > Thanks. Ok to me.
> 
> I'm slightly cautious here, although I haven't read the patch yet.
> Did anyone consider whether any of these structures were copied to
> user space, and whether, as a result of this change, we're now
> copying uninitialised data to users?

I believe that it, to change from strcpy() to strlcpy(), just 
eliminates possibility of buffer-overrun.

--yoshfuji