On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 11:59, David S. Miller wrote: > I agree, using sizeof() is the less error prone way of > doing things like this. > > Felipe could you please rewrite your patch like this? Done!
|
| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6]: IPv6: strcpy -> strlcpy |
| From: | Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:04:04 +0100 |
| Cc: | "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031127025921.3fed8dd4.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1069920883.2476.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031127.173320.19253188.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031127025921.3fed8dd4.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 11:59, David S. Miller wrote: > I agree, using sizeof() is the less error prone way of > doing things like this. > > Felipe could you please rewrite your patch like this? Done!
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Level One LXT1001 GE chip, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6]: IPv6: strcpy -> strlcpy, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6]: IPv6: strcpy -> strlcpy, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6]: IPv6: strcpy -> strlcpy, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
