netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC: Enabling ethernet drivers to return FCS in the skb?

To: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RFC: Enabling ethernet drivers to return FCS in the skb?
From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 01:02:41 -0800
Cc: "'netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20031120173404.A1538@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Candela Technologies
References: <3FB94311.10004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031119123556.A7622@xxxxxxxxxx> <3FBB8D61.6010106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031120173404.A1538@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:33:53AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:

Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:

The Intel i82586 and i82596 and can be told to receive frames with a bad FCS.
They can also be told to send a precomputed FCS rather than computing it on
the fly. The i82596 and tulip can also transfer the FCS to memory when
receiving frames. I guess all of this is also supported on the i82557/8/9.

If you have a patch or example code that shows how to do this, I'd love to
see it.  I have code that should RX bad CSUM from the Intel folks, but I can't
get it to generate bad CRC (it does framing errors instead with my attempt),
so I can't test the RX code properly!


The i825xx Ethernet chips are configured by putting a configure command on
the TX list. One of the bits of the configure command tells the chip to
discard or keep packets with errors. Assuming you can find that piece of
code, flipping the bit is easy enough. Similiarily for transferring the FCS
to/from memory. IIRC, this is a per-frame setting for TX on i82596 and
i82557/8/9. You can find i82596 documentation on Intel's home page and
the i82557/8/9 on SourceForge under the e100 (or was it e1000?) project.

Thanks, I found the e100 document (from sourceforge) and it looks like it can
definately receive all sorts of busted packets with a little configuration.

It's less clear what happens when you turn off the FCS generation.  One part of
the document mentions it gets it from RAM, which I assume means it uses the last
part of the DMA'd packet???  Another explanation of the transmit state machine 
does
not mention that you can disable FCS generation...  I'm going to print this out
and read it again in detail...

I searched Intel's site for the e1000 docs, but could not find any detailed
information.  Does anyone have a link to a (legal) copy of the e1000 docs?

Thanks for the detailed information.  When I get the e100 and e1000 working to
my satisfaction, I'll work on the tulip driver a bit.

Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>