| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Kernel crash in 2.6.0-test9-mm3 |
| From: | Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linux@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:05:27 +1300 |
| Cc: | kumarkr@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031119185157.3edf69c8.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <OF0696EDA9.D66EB77E-ON88256DE3.0009C15A@xxxxxxxxxx> <6.0.1.1.0.20031119155347.023f89d0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031119185157.3edf69c8.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Yes - with the patch backed out, the system has been up for 20 hours
without a crash and nothing has been logged. I was just holding off a bit
longer before reporting back in case it just needs a bit more time to
trigger ;-)
Reuben At 15:51 20/11/2003, David S. Miller wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:58:18 +1300 Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linux@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > The system is a UP system.. Have you done ask Andrew asked, backing out the atomic_dec_and_test() debugging patch to see if all the weird kernel log messages go away as a result? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CFT] 2.6.x experimental net driver updates, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Kernel crash in 2.6.0-test9-mm3, Reuben Farrelly |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Kernel crash in 2.6.0-test9-mm3, Reuben Farrelly |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |