| To: | Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion |
| From: | Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:36:52 -0500 |
| Cc: | Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Brad House <brad_mssw@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3FBC1A72.9020101@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <47973.68.105.173.45.1069042089.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FB9A277.70309@xxxxxxxxx> <20031118135848.A2451@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FBBA76B.4070606@xxxxxxxxx> <20031120010056.A19444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FBC05FB.2020409@xxxxxxxx> <20031120014550.A22377@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FBC11F2.5080805@xxxxxxxx> <1069292052.3241.36.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FBC1A72.9020101@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030921 |
ok, misunderstood again ... geez .... now I get it ... he'll apply the 1.6 patch this weekend ... _sigh_ I really must be brain dead today. -Brad Brad House wrote: yes, I definately misunderstood then ... sorry ;) I'll just apply the patches to my version and see what happens ;) -Brad Andre Tomt wrote:On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 01:59, Brad House wrote:any reason why it's not against the v1.6 ?I think you misunderstood. If I intepret the list correctly, the 1.6 changes are in that list (as "your changes (week-end)".)the current driver is missing support for the 8110S chip (or at least it doesn't seem to work at all), so you're cutting out all the chips on the mobos out there. Haven't looked to see if it's just a PCI ID or other functionality, but since the V1.2 is from realtek that's in the official kernel, it would make sense to use the 1.6 patch....IIRC, the realtek one got cleaned up a great deal before entering mainline, both bug-fixes and coding style cleanups. Your patch may revert a lot of that work (I havn't looked at it closely.) Also the changelog differs for the 1.2 entry between the two versions, indicating just this. Lets take one step at a time ;-)It is against the original r8169. Once finished, it should look like: - first cut at dma api conversion (today) - remaining bits of dma api conversion (tomorrow) - rx_copybreak (tomorrow) - your changes (week-end) - big-endian fixes (week-end)Each part divided in reasonably small patches to ease the test/review process. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion, Brad House |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Function to determine if IP exists on a net-device?, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion, Brad House |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |