| To: | Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Nov 2003 01:45:50 +0100 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Brad House <brad_mssw@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3FBC05FB.2020409@xxxxxxxx>; from brad@xxxxxxxx on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:08:27PM -0500 |
| References: | <47973.68.105.173.45.1069042089.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FB9A277.70309@xxxxxxxxx> <20031118135848.A2451@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FBBA76B.4070606@xxxxxxxxx> <20031120010056.A19444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FBC05FB.2020409@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx> : > Just because I'm way to lazy to actually look, is this > against the original r8169, or my patch from the v1.6 > driver ?? It is against the original r8169. Once finished, it should look like: - first cut at dma api conversion (today) - remaining bits of dma api conversion (tomorrow) - rx_copybreak (tomorrow) - your changes (week-end) - big-endian fixes (week-end) Each part divided in reasonably small patches to ease the test/review process. -- Ueimor |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion, Brad House |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion, Brad House |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion, Brad House |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion, Brad House |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |