| To: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH]: Adjust qlen when grafting in multiple qdiscs |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 17 Nov 2003 14:25:01 -0500 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Werner Almesberger <werner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3FB9103C.9080504@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolis |
| References: | <3FB3996A.6080008@xxxxxxxxx> <1069076786.1075.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FB8DDE0.1070105@xxxxxxxxx> <1069081153.1022.20.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FB8F3BF.6050509@xxxxxxxxx> <1069090210.1022.64.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FB9103C.9080504@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 13:15, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >My opinion is that since these interfaces (ex qdisc) exist they > >exist to be (ab)used. > >Dsmark happens to work well with the single queue - maybe thats what > >needs to be documented as opposed to saying it deviates from a purist > >angle. > > > > > As I said I've never used dsmark, I changed it while fixing TBF (where > it is a problem, TBF was changed not long ago to support attaching inner > qdiscs), so anything is fine with me. I just became a purist defending > correctness of the patch ;) Now that we have invoked Werner - lets wait for his response then ;-> Sorry, didnt meant to drag this into 5-6 emails thread. I closely looked at your other changes on that patch and they looked fine. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] ibmtr -- convert to new probeing, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix erratic behavior in rt6_dump_route(), David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH]: Adjust qlen when grafting in multiple qdiscs, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH]: Adjust qlen when grafting in multiple qdiscs, Werner Almesberger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |