[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] e100: Enable receiving bogus packets, and transmitting bad/

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e100: Enable receiving bogus packets, and transmitting bad/custom CRC
From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:48:25 -0800
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
Organization: Candela Technologies
References: <> <>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
David S. Miller wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:24:11 -0800
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jeff, Dave, et al, please let me know if this is of interest!

I think the rx_all facility is very useful.

Secondarily, I think we should address the other features

What I think you should do is split out the rx_all functionality
into a seperate patch, and once we've refined and integrated that
we can work one-by-one on the CRC and other bits.

So, RX-ALL can be one flag, another for RX-FCS, and the TX-CUSTOM-FCS
can be a separate patch altogether?

It would also be possible to add individual 'rx-foo', ie long, bad-crc, 
bad-frame, etc.
But, I think that would probably be over-kill at this point.

Any problem with using the netdev->priv_flags to hold the RX-ALL and RX-FCS 

Btw, it's impossible (afaik) to see the CRC errors generically w/out accessing 
(which I assume works, but have never actually tried), ie
there is no column in /proc/net/dev for rx-crc-errors.  It would be an excellent
time to allow me to add the ethtool hook to read the net_device_stats struct via
a single ioctl call! :)

Thanks, Ben

Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>