[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0-test9-bk27-netdrvr-exp1 - r8169 update

To: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0-test9-bk27-netdrvr-exp1 - r8169 update
From: Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:21:31 -0500
Cc: Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031118
Yes, I can do that.  These are the patches I applied:

I did not apply these patches below because your answer suggested that I
should not as per the e-mail on 11/23:

>> cool. Did those previous patches you posted get merged into the
>> current netdrvr-exp1, or do those need to be applied as well ?
> It is built on top of 2.6.0-test9-bk27 + (latest) netdrvr-exp:

These are the patches _NOT_applied:
From 11/20/03
From 11/19/03

Let me know where to begin, and I'll do it.


Francois Romieu wrote:
Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx> :

2) vanilla 2.6.0-test9 does not work either.

correct, but the system doesn't lock up with vanilla -test9, dhcpcd just hangs, then will eventually return.

I have fscked something then. Could you apply the patches in order to
figure which one triggers the lock-up ?


Brad House
Sr. Developer
Main Street Softworks, Inc.

(386) 462-9522 Ext. 112

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>