| To: | Mark Huth <mhuth@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation. |
| From: | Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:31:29 -0800 |
| Cc: | David S Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3FA2F069.4070005@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200310312006.h9VK62Hh005910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1067635446.11564.92.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031031132331.35a9aaca.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3FA2F069.4070005@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 15:29, Mark Huth wrote: > Nah, they are different algorithms, as the assembler code clearly > demonstrates. The above snippet is incomplete, with the crucial > multiply by 2 or the shift left omitted. The assembler code reveals > this crucial piece of information. Right. My mistake. Clear upon explanation, thanks. I think I misread based on expectation rather than code. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation., David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation., David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation., Mark Huth |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation., David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |