| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation. |
| From: | Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:24:06 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <200310312006.h9VK62Hh005910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200310312006.h9VK62Hh005910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 19:43, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> ChangeSet 1.1399, 2003/10/30 19:43:04-08:00, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [IPX]: Fix checksum computation.
> diff -Nru a/net/appletalk/ddp.c b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
> --- a/net/appletalk/ddp.c Fri Oct 31 12:06:06 2003
> +++ b/net/appletalk/ddp.c Fri Oct 31 12:06:06 2003
> @@ -937,9 +937,13 @@
> {
> /* This ought to be unwrapped neatly. I'll trust gcc for now */
> while (len--) {
> - sum += *data++;
> + sum += *data;
> sum <<= 1;
> - sum = ((sum >> 16) + sum) & 0xFFFF;
> + if (sum & 0x10000) {
> + sum++;
> + sum &= 0xffff;
> + }
> + data++;
> }
> return sum;
> }
This change didn't appear on this list for comment,
it just appeared in the source.
Why is this a "fix"? Performance?
It seems more like someone's idea of code neatening.
If this is done, why not if (unlikely())
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Bonding-devel] [PATCH] [bonding 2.4] fix creating/destroying the /proc/net/bonding dir, Jay Vosburgh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation., David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Fix for ipx interface module_get panic., Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [IPX]: Fix checksum computation., David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |