| To: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPv6 on-link assumption considered harmful |
| From: | David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:56:02 +0000 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310302106000.22649-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310302106000.22649-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 21:09 +0200, Pekka Savola wrote: > Just to give a heads-up before this is finalized, to give people ability > to prepare or comment prior to this process is formalized in the IETF. With corresponding changes to the route advertisement protocol as used by radvd, so that routes can actually be advertised to autoconfigured nodes? Or does that already exist and I just missed it when I was looking? -- dwmw2 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [2.6.0-test9] QoS HTB crash..., devik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PROBLEM: kernel BUG at dev.c:998! - panic w/ uml/bridge and Intel 82562 (e100), Scott Feldman |
| Previous by Thread: | IPv6 on-link assumption considered harmful, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | issues with SO_PRIORITY and IP_TOS, Chris Friesen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |