| To: | Olaf Hering <olh@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux kernel updates and ip_crossover patch |
| From: | Mehulkumar J Patel <mehul.patel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:33:57 +0530 |
| Cc: | Anil K Prasad <aprasad@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anil K Prasad <aprasad@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kaena Freitas <kaena@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthias Fruehauf <mfrueh@xxxxxxx>, olaf@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Mehulkumar J Patel <mehul.patel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Hello All, Any update on this. Basically we need IP CROSSOVER patch to be part of pseries kernel. best regards, Mehul.
On Wed, Sep 24, Kaena Freitas wrote: > > > > > Hello Mehul - > > Sorry it has taken me a while to respond. We do not keep any code in CMVC. > All code we get from SuSE is on the ftp3 site along with all the source > RPMs. We do have internel CVS trees, but there is no guarantee that those > trees are current with the code we get from SuSE which is what your team > should be testing. > > As for the htx patch you've provided, I have copied SuSE on this email to > get their comments if it can be part of their distribution. Good morning, did you sent the patch to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx? What opinion have the network and iptables maintainers about this feature? > (See attached file: hxecom_patch)forgot to attach the patch. > > > e-mail: mehul.patel@xxxxxxxxxx > IBM Global Services > Bangalore, India. > Tel: 091-80-5094160 > > > > > Mehulkumar J > Patel To: Kaena Freitas/Austin/IBM > cc: Anil K Prasad/India/IBM@IBMIN, Daljeet > 23/09/2003 18:38 Maini/India/IBM@IBMIN > Please respond to From: Mehulkumar J Patel/India/IBM@IBMIN > Subject: Linux kernel updates and ip_crossover patch > > > > > > > Hi, > > We are HTX Team. > We get affected by changes in Linux kernel in a way where we have to update > our build environment > continuously. As of now we are doing so manually. But considering the > effort we are thinking of making > it automated. > > Can you please tell us if there is a fixed place from where we can sync > Linux kernel sources through > scripts. Or do you put Linux kernel sources in cmvc or any other version > control system. > > Also, we have an exerciser named "hxecom" which requires an external patch, > ip_crossover for hxecom > to work in single system test. > This patch helps us in sending packets destined to IP address on the same > machine without looping > back at IP layer. Packet actually goes out to hardware and thus we are able > to stress network cards. > For this patch to work, kernel should have been compiled with netfilter. > If netfilter is not enabled and ip_crossover patch is not applied, we end > up recompiling the whole > stuff and need to copy kernel and /lib/modules on all the test machines, > which is bit ugly. > Can you please include these two request from us in all p-series kernels ? > > I am attaching the patch here. > > best regards, > Mehul. > e-mail: mehul.patel@xxxxxxxxxx > IBM Global Services > Bangalore, India. > Tel: 091-80-5094160 > > > -- USB is for mice, FireWire is for men! sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ppc32 lockups with 2.6 (maybe network related), Christian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux kernel updates and ip_crossover patch, Matthias Fruehauf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linux kernel updates and ip_crossover patch, Anil K Prasad |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux kernel updates and ip_crossover patch, Matthias Fruehauf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |