| To: | "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/10] [bonding 2.6] fix monitoring functions |
| From: | Amir Noam <amir.noam@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:56:07 +0200 |
| Cc: | <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <E6F7D288B394A64585E67497E5126BA601F99143@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E6F7D288B394A64585E67497E5126BA601F99143@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.4.3 |
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 10:01 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> applied to 2.6. does this need to go into 2.4, too?
As Jay has pointed out this is already in 2.4.
However, the following patch that restores backward compatibility with
old ifenslave is still needed for 2.6. I see that it's already been
applied by David Miller to 2.4.
Amir
diff -Naurp a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c Thu Oct 30 10:38:34 2003
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c Thu Oct 30 10:45:02 2003
@@ -3047,6 +3047,10 @@ static int bond_ioctl(struct net_device
case SIOCBONDRELEASE:
ret = bond_release(master_dev, slave_dev);
break;
+ case BOND_SETHWADDR_OLD:
+ case SIOCBONDSETHWADDR:
+ res = bond_sethwaddr(bond_dev, slave_dev);
+ break;
case BOND_CHANGE_ACTIVE_OLD:
case SIOCBONDCHANGEACTIVE:
if (USES_PRIMARY(bond_mode)) {
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Bug somewhere in crypto or ipsec stuff, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.0-test9: access beyond end of device, Andrew Morton |
| Previous by Thread: | Bug somewhere in crypto or ipsec stuff, Paul Mackerras |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/10] [bonding 2.6] fix monitoring functions, Jay Vosburgh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |