| To: | torvalds@xxxxxxxx (Linus Torvalds) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux 2.6.0-test9 |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Oct 2003 22:36:21 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | akpm@xxxxxxxx, Andries.Brouwer@xxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kernel Mailing List), netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller), kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310261607230.3157-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Linus Torvalds" at Oct 26, 2003 04:21:59 PM |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > And Alexey apparently tried to do the "FIXME" part, but without thinking > about the SIGURG part. Actually, it was thought a lot for several linux-2.x. :-) > We _need_ to stop at urgent data and we _should_ return -EINTR, and let > the SIGURG handler do the URG read. Otherwise we'll lose urgent data (or > we'll just read it inline without realizing that it was urgent data). The patch was expected not to break this property. Alas, something is overlooked yet. I still do not understand what exactly is broken, I feel I have to find some rlogin to experiment in vivo. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [2.6.0-test8/9] ethertap oops, Simon Roscic |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux 2.6.0-test9, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linux 2.6.0-test9, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux 2.6.0-test9, Tommy Christensen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |